Back to Home Page Features August 18, 2006
Highlight News
August 17, 2006
August 16, 2006
August 15, 2006
August 14, 2006
August 13, 2006
August 12, 2006
News & Views
City
Opinion
National
World
Business
Features
Sports
Latest News
Supplement
Gallery
Weekly Roundup
Past Editions
Resources
Acronyms
Addresses
Indonesian Cabinet
Indonesian History
RI-GAM MOU
State of the Nation Address 2006
President's Inauguration Speech
Tsunami Declaration
IMF Reforms
Anniversary Edition
2004 Elections
Links
Where to go
Members Area
Register
Login
Archives
Who's Who
About Us
Company Info
Online Media Kit
Print Media Kit
Associates
Google
UI students place 2nd in Australs

Features - August 06, 2006

S. Astrid K., Contributor, Jakarta

In an range of challenging debates, over 80 teams from more than 30 of the best universities across Australasia battled it out in what is considered to be the most intellectually demanding debating competition in the world, the Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championship, at Victoria University in Wellington, New Zealand, from July 2 to 10, 2006.

Widely known as Australs, the competition is the world's second largest debating tournament and is equal in prestige to the World University Debating Championships. The cultural diversity of the teams, combined with the wide range of topics for debate, makes the tournament the most remarkable social, cultural and intellectual exchange available to any student.

Over its 30-year history it has developed from a competition purely between Australian teams, to involving initially just New Zealand, and then all of Asia. It now attracts the whole Asia-Pacific, including Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Japan, South Korea and India.

This year Indonesia sent one team from the English Debating Society Universitas Indonesia (EDS-UI), consisting of Siti Astrid Kusumawardhani (from the school of social and political science), Melany Tedja (school of computer science) and Astrid Fina Nurshinta (school of social and political science).

In the freezing winter, teams had to debate in train station buildings, campuses, government chambers and lecture halls on various topics ranging from regional politics, international economic policies, sports, culture, religion and philosophy. The topics, called "motions", were released just before the debate started, giving teams only thirty minutes to prepare their speeches. During this year's competition, new topics were introduced, including banning advertising during children's television programs, disbanding the World Trade Organization, transferring military resources from Iraq to Afghanistan and adopting a common history textbook for East Asia.

The tournament consisted of seven preliminary rounds, where teams were ranked on number of victories, judge points and total speaker points. The top sixteen then advanced to knock-out rounds -- commencing with the octo-finals and finishing with the grand final. The physically and mentally exhausting nine-day event was also complete with many social events and gatherings such as American Independence Day party, break night and final night party, ballroom and championship dinner, women's debate, public speaking competition and comedy debate night.

In the English as Second Language (ESL) Round, the Indonesian team was named runner-up, the best achievement since Indonesia first participated in the tournament.

The ESL round is designed for countries whose mother tongue is not English, thus placing them at an inherent disadvantage against teams with no language barrier.

Indonesia defeated UT Mara Malaysia in the ESL semi-final, debating the motion: We should publish cartoons of religious figures. Unfortunately, the winning streak came to an end when the team was defeated in the ESL grand final by the International Islamic University Malaysia in a 4-3 split decision on the motion: That we should introduce hard labor for criminals in developed countries.

Indonesia's team member Siti Astrid K., was named among the top 3 ESL best speakers in the tournament.

The grand final took place on the last night of the event and everyone came to watch the anticipated debate between Monash University and Melbourne University. The motion for debate was: That it should be legitimate to use aid to buy votes in international organizations, the best two teams in the tournament demonstrated their skill with astute arguments combined with deadly attacks to destroy the case of their opponents. The excellent debate left the audience speculating on who would be crowned champion. In a split decision of six to three, Monash was declared the champion of Australs 2006, with one of their team members, Rolland Dillon, winning the Jock Fanselow Cup for best speaker in the grand final. The Martin Sorenson Cup for best speaker went to Elizabeth Sheargold from the opposing Melbourne team, and the public speaking winner was Jess Moir, also from Melbourne.

Amid the euphoria and the Monash debating anthem ringing in our ears, the tournament came to an end as everyone said their goodbyes and expressed the hope they would see each other in future competitions. This was a very rewarding and enjoyable tournament where students could practice what they had learned and compete against the best in the world. One can only hope that the next Australs, to be held in UT Mara Malaysia, will be as marvelous as this one.


City   Opinion   National   World   Business   Features   Sports   Latest News   Supplement
Gallery   Weekly Roundup   Your Column   Past Editions
Acronyms   Addresses   Indonesian Cabinet  
Indonesian History   Links   Where to go
Archives   Who's Who  
Company Info   Online Media Kit   Print Media Kit   Home


This Website is designed for The Jakarta Post by CNRG ITB.
All contents copyright © of The Jakarta Post.
webmaster@thejakartapost.com